「Crypto Airdrop」タグアーカイブ

What is ‘Ton Station’ on Telegram? An In-Depth Analysis of Mister Soon Token’s Future with Latest Updates & Market Predictions

## Why is ‘Ton Station’ Gaining Attention Now? The New Wave of Telegram Airdrops

In recent years, the success of projects like Notcoin and Hamster Kombat has brought global attention to airdrops (free distribution of cryptocurrencies) based on the messaging app Telegram. The ease with which users can earn crypto by completing simple tasks has led to a massive movement, attracting millions of participants. This article will delve into the essence and future prospects of ‘Ton Station,’ which is anticipated to be the next promising candidate in this trend.

These projects are built on the TON (The Open Network) blockchain, primarily developed by Telegram. Ton Station is one such project, drawing significant interest due to its potential to incorporate even more advanced mechanisms, leveraging the success of its predecessors.

## Ton Station’s Basic Structure: A Season-Based Reward System

To understand the appeal of Ton Station, it’s essential to first grasp its fundamental mechanics. This section explains how the project progresses and how participants earn rewards.

The basic flow of the project involves users performing simple tasks within the Telegram app (Mini App) to earn points or items (e.g., keys) as rewards. These activities are conducted in periods called ‘seasons’.

* **Season 1:** Already concluded, enhancing the project’s reputation by providing benefits to participants.
* **Season 2:** Recently completed, currently in the phase of reward aggregation and elimination of illicit users.
* **Season 3:** Announced to start soon, potentially offering a new opportunity for participation.

This phased progression is a strategy to maintain community engagement and foster the long-term growth of the project.

## Latest Developments: Multi-Token Strategy and the Early TGE of ‘ESX’

Particularly interesting in Ton Station’s strategy is its multi-token approach. In this section, we will explore clues about the project’s future developments based on recent concrete movements.

Ton Station has publicly announced a ‘multi-token strategy,’ planning to issue a total of 10 different tokens, not just the central ‘Mister Soon’ token. This aims to form a vast economic zone (ecosystem) with a diverse range of tokens, each serving various purposes.

As a concrete move supporting this strategy, one of the 10 tokens, ‘EstateX (ESX),’ completed its TGE on June 19, 2024.

TGE stands for ‘Token Generation Event,’ referring to the event where a token is first generated on the blockchain and begins to circulate in the market. It is, in essence, like an Initial Public Offering (IPO) in the stock market.

The fact that the ESX token entered the market early indicates that the project is not merely in the planning phase but is steadily in the execution stage, further increasing anticipation for the central Mister Soon token.

## Mister Soon Token: Listing Timeline and Price Predictions Drawing Market Attention

The central element of the project is the ‘Mister Soon’ token. Here, we objectively analyze the most highly anticipated listing timeline and price, carefully distinguishing between current market predictions and official information.

### When Will it List? Probable Timelines and Background

Firstly, and most importantly, as of June 2024, no official listing date for the Mister Soon token has been announced.

However, some market analysts and influencers are whispering ‘around July 2024’ as a potential timeframe. This prediction seems to be based on observations of other large-scale TON projects like Hamster Kombat and estimations of the time required for exchange listing preparations. It’s crucial to remember, however, that this is merely a prediction and could significantly change depending on the project’s progress.

### Which Exchanges Will It List On? DEX and CEX Candidates

Various speculations are also circulating regarding the listing venues, which significantly influence a token’s value. There are broadly two types of listing venues:

* **DEX (Decentralized Exchange):** A platform where no specific central authority exists, and transactions are executed automatically by programs. On the TON blockchain, Ston.fi and DeDust.io are well-known.
* **CEX (Centralized Exchange):** A common cryptocurrency exchange that we typically use, operated and managed by a company.

The following exchanges are being mentioned as strong candidates in the market:

| Type | Predicted Exchange Candidates |
| :— | :————————– |
| DEX | Ston.fi, DeDust.io, Megaton Finance |
| CEX | MEXC, Gate.io, KuCoin, Bybit, Bitget |

Among CEXs, MEXC, which is proactive in listing new tokens, is considered one of the strongest candidates. However, as this is not an official announcement, it’s wise to treat it as reference information.

### Expected Price and Tokenomics (Token Economy)

Crucial for assessing a token’s future is its ‘tokenomics,’ which refers to the design of its supply and distribution. Market predictions suggest Mister Soon’s total supply will be around 1 billion tokens.

Based on this, several price predictions exist, with one perspective suggesting a range of $0.005 to $0.06 per token. This is a very broad range, indicating that the price could fluctuate significantly depending on market conditions and the attention it receives upon listing.

For example, if you were to acquire 2,000 tokens through an airdrop and the price stabilized at $0.01 per token after listing, its value would be $2,000 x $0.01 = $20 (approx. ¥3,000 JPY). If it reached the upper end of the price prediction at $0.06, it would be $120 (approx. ¥18,000 JPY). Of course, there’s also a significant possibility of it falling below this.

## Objective Perspective: The True Meaning of ‘100% Community Allocation’ and Project Risks

When considering participation, it is extremely important to understand the risks as well as the potential. Ton Station promotes the message of ‘100% of tokens provided to the community,’ but taking this literally might be premature.

Generally, for a project to grow sustainably, tokens are allocated for various purposes, such as development team operational funds, liquidity provision, and ecosystem expansion. The phrase ‘100% community’ is often realistically interpreted as a marketing expression indicating an approach where the majority of tokens are distributed based on user activity, rather than being sold in large quantities only to investors during an initial sale.

Furthermore, the following risks should also be considered:

* **Schedule Delays:** The possibility that development may not proceed according to the announced timeline.
* **Price Volatility:** Tokens obtained through airdrops often experience concentrated selling pressure immediately after listing, tending to lead to significant price drops.
* **Information Uncertainty:** Unofficial speculation and rumors are prone to spread, requiring careful discernment of accurate information.

## Conclusion: Ton Station’s Future Prospects and Key Checkpoints

This article has provided a multi-faceted explanation of ‘Ton Station,’ a noteworthy Telegram-based project, covering everything from its mechanics to future predictions.

In conclusion, while Ton Station holds significant potential, it is also a project fraught with many uncertainties. The successful TGE of the precursor token ESX is a positive sign, but the success of the central Mister Soon token remains to be seen.

Moving forward, the most crucial aspect when engaging with this project is to obtain the latest information from reliable sources. Do not be swayed by speculation, and consider participation based on your own judgment.

We hope this article helps you understand the new trend of Ton Station.

[In-Depth Analysis] The Truth About OpenLoop’s “Launch Soon” Claim? 5 Dangerous Signs to Know Before Expecting an Airdrop

Airdrops, often touted as a way to “get free crypto assets,” are an attractive opportunity for many. Among them, OpenLoop, a system where users can easily earn points through a PC browser extension, has announced “Launch Soon,” raising expectations among participants. However, it might be too soon to uncritically embrace this announcement. This seemingly appealing project harbors several “dangerous signs” that warrant careful analysis.

This article aims to provide an unbiased, multi-faceted analysis of the risks inherent in OpenLoop, based on publicly available information and objective facts. We hope this article serves as a compass for you to discern risks on your own and protect your valuable assets.

Dangerous Sign 1: Unnaturally High-Priced and Unsold “Nodes”

One hint to gauge a project’s soundness lies in its revenue model and participation methods. OpenLoop sells what it calls “nodes,” which are akin to contribution rights to the project, and this presents the first point of concern. Node holders are purportedly offered more points and preferential treatment in future airdrops.

Specifically, the following points can be noted:

  • High Price Point: Node prices vary by Tier. For example, a “Tier 2” node is sold for 0.85 SOL. This is by no means a small amount for many airdrop participants.
  • Prolonged Sales Period: According to source information, these node sales have been ongoing for several months and are reportedly not yet sold out. Truly promising projects often see such contribution rights sell out quickly.
  • Campaigns Inciting Purchases: Campaigns such as “Node purchasers will share a reward pool totaling $500,000” are being promoted. However, this needs to be considered calmly. If thousands or tens of thousands of purchasers emerge, the per-person return could be very small. This can be seen more as a marketing tactic to incite purchases than pure rewards.

A structure that sells high-priced products to users drawn in by the promise of an airdrop is a point that should be carefully evaluated when judging the project’s soundness.

Dangerous Sign 2: Mysterious Funder: “IPA Foundation”

When assessing a project’s trustworthiness, the identity of its investors (funding) is an extremely crucial indicator. OpenLoop publicly states on its official website that it has successfully raised $15 million (over approximately 2.3 billion JPY) from the “IPA Foundation.” However, a deeper dive into this funder’s background reveals several significant questions.

According to data from CryptoRank and other sources, this large-scale fundraising was conducted by a single entity, the “IPA Foundation.” Furthermore, the past investment track record of this foundation includes the name “Havera,” a project widely known as a scam in the crypto industry.

Similar Case: Eerie Similarities with “Havera”

Past cases are important keys to predicting the future. Havera, which also involved the IPA Foundation, heavily advertised funding from the foundation, but the project ultimately failed, and many participants reportedly incurred losses. What’s even more concerning is the similarity in their tactics:

A foundation, purportedly an investor, intensively and excessively promotes only specific investment projects (Havera and OpenLoop) on social media. This raises suspicion that it might be self-serving authority created by project insiders, rather than an independent third-party investor.

Thus, the questionable credibility of the funder and the strong resemblance to past failed cases are significant risk factors for OpenLoop.

Dangerous Sign 3: Low Evaluation from Third-Party Organizations

A project’s evaluation should not only rely on its own announcements but also on objective third-party perspectives. CryptoRank, a site that aggregates and evaluates information on crypto projects, categorizes projects based on their trustworthiness and track record. OpenLoop has received a “Tier 4” rating there. This is a very low evaluation among projects listed on CryptoRank, suggesting that external expert organizations have given a harsh evaluation regarding the project’s trustworthiness, transparency, and technical feasibility.

Dangerous Sign 4: Predicted “Exit Scam” Scenario

Based on the analysis so far, a typical scenario for OpenLoop’s potential future actions emerges. This is a tactic known as an “Exit Scam,” used by many fraudulent projects.

  1. Cultivating Expectation: First, they maximize user expectations with announcements like “Launch Soon” or “TGE (Token Generation Event) imminent.” (This is precisely the current situation.)
  2. Creating Hype: Next, they announce concrete token issuance plans, generating excitement within the community.
  3. The Final Harvest: Then, they announce decisive conditions, such as “Only node holders will be eligible for airdrops” or “Node holders will receive 10 to 20 times more airdrops than regular users.”
  4. Disappearance: Users who don’t want to miss out on the airdrop rush to purchase expensive nodes in a panic. The operators then abandon the project, cease communication, and flee with the accumulated funds at the peak of this collection.

Of course, this is merely one predicted scenario. However, the dangerous signs listed so far are sufficient to make this scenario appear realistic.

Conclusion: How Should We Approach OpenLoop?

Summing up the analysis so far, we are compelled to conclude that participation in the OpenLoop project, especially any financial investment, carries extremely high risks.

In conclusion, the purchase of expensive “nodes” is strongly not recommended, as there is a very high probability of losing all investment funds.

For free point farming, which involves no monetary loss, it’s fine to proceed at your own risk. However, you should keep in mind that the time and effort spent, and above all, excessive expectations, are likely to go unrewarded. Most importantly, the basic self-defense measure is not to be swayed by sweet words and to avoid easily investing your own funds.

Summary: To Protect Your Future Self from Being Scammed. 4-Point Checklist to Spot Suspicious Projects

This OpenLoop case offers us an important lesson. When you encounter a new crypto project in the future, use the following checklist to assess its legitimacy. Adopting this perspective will be your most powerful shield in protecting your valuable assets from future scams.

  • ✅ Does it demand high participation fees?
    While claiming “free airdrops,” is the system designed such that it’s almost meaningless without purchasing expensive NFTs or nodes?
  • ✅ Are the investors credible?
    Can you verify the funder’s website and past investment track record? Are there any suspicious points, such as unnaturally strong support for only a specific project?
  • ✅ Does it resemble past scam cases?
    Do the funding scheme or community promotion methods resemble tactics used by projects that previously caused problems?
  • ✅ What is the objective reputation from third parties?
    Beyond the project’s official website and social media, is there objective and critical discussion on independent evaluation sites and in multiple communities?

The world of crypto assets is full of innovative technology and great potential, but it also carries unknown risks. Not taking information at face value, always maintaining a critical perspective, and conducting your own research and analysis are the only ways to navigate this world safely.